IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/akt/journl/v14y2019i1p8-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patent Specialization Atlas as a Tool for the Monitoring of Promising Technological Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Ilina,
  • Elizaveta Agamirova
  • Viktoria Lapochkina

    (Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

Abstract

Introduction. To enter top 5 countries leading in technological development, it is necessary to increase the R&D aimed at creating protectable engineering solutions and techniques. Patenting activity analysis indicates a global trend for reduction in applications. It also highlights the main problems hindering the growth of patenting activity in Russia: low demand of business for inventions, decrease in the number of researchers, etc. On the base of the literature analysis made, the authors conclude that many studies of innovation and technological potential often do not take into account the inluence of such an important factor as the size of a country. It is also not always taken into account that some countries patent more than others in all areas of technology. Only a small part of researchers note the relevance of the use of additional indicators in order to minimize the inluence of the above factors. Materials and Methods. The article discusses the issues of identifying the most actively developing technological areas with the use of the Relative Specialization Index (RSI). After analyzing various sources of information, the authors identiied two approaches to RSI calculation. One of them is used by the UK patent oice, and the second, more common, is used by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Both approaches help to deine the country’s existing S&T priorities and its position among other countries in each of 35 technological areas according to the International Patent Classiication (IPC). The authors base their study on the UK approach. Results and Discussion. The article presents a comparative analysis of patenting dynamics in the Russian Federation and abroad through the lens of technological areas, the examples of calculating and applying RSI for the patent specialization atlas creation. Today domestic funds to support science, technology and innovation do not actively use patent information for the purpose of technological forecasting that is necessary to form competitions for the support of scientiic projects. That in turn can lead to ineicient investing. Conclusion. The authors developed the patent specialization atlas (according to patents granted) on the base of the patent specialization index, which can be used by the funds to support science, technology and innovation in making strategic decisions concerning investment, as well as grant receivers at the stage of designing technological solutions. The study resulted in the matrix of the RSI ranking of countries by technology area that makes it possible to determine a position of the Top 10 countries leading in patenting activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Ilina, & Elizaveta Agamirova & Viktoria Lapochkina, 2019. "Patent Specialization Atlas as a Tool for the Monitoring of Promising Technological Areas," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 14(1), pages 8-41, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:8-41
    DOI: 10.33873/1996-9953.2019.14-1.8-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2019/1(31)_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33873/1996-9953.2019.14-1.8-41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. V. V. Spasennikov, 2023. "Experience of innovation management in the process of creation and implementation of inventions," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 9(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:8-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lubov Pudovkina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://riep.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.