IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/akt/journl/v11y2016i1p142-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Results of Monitoring of Russian Centers for Shared Use of Scientific Equipment (Core Research Facilities) and Unique Scientific Installations (Large Research Facilities) for 2014

Author

Listed:
  • Kirill Kalyuzhnyi

    (Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

Abstract

A network of Core Research Facilities (CKP) and Large research facilities (UNU) has been developing in Russia. The government provides active legal and financial support to CKP and UNU. A significant portion of them is located in organizations managed by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. Yearly monitoring of CKP and UNU activities provides information for assessment of their capacity and effectiveness. In the course of analysis, high dependence of Russia’s Core Research Facilities on foreign manufacturers has been revealed. In CKP subordinated to the Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations (FASO) research equipment has been renovated at slower rates than in the whole sample. In contrast, productivity in the group of FASO CKP is higher than on average. The work load of expensive research equipment used for the benefit of external users is low. Most of the articles in physics and chemistry were published in journals ranked low in Web of Science database. The number of articles published in foreign high-ranking journals is 2-2.5 times less than in low-ranking. Core Research Facilities do not provide comprehensive information about their services to potential clients. Urgent steps for updating their website content are needed. Large research facilities deal mainly with basic research. Most of them belong to research organizations managed by FASO. Most of articles prepared with the use of UNU are published in low-ranking journals. UNU are under-represented on Internet. The situation is fairly dramatic in comparison with that of CKP. The author suggests to use the results of monitoring in the course of CKP/UNU Development Roadmap design and government financial support planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirill Kalyuzhnyi, 2016. "The Results of Monitoring of Russian Centers for Shared Use of Scientific Equipment (Core Research Facilities) and Unique Scientific Installations (Large Research Facilities) for 2014," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 11(1), pages 142-158, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:142-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2016/1(19)_09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:142-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lubov Pudovkina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://riep.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.