IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/akt/journl/v10y2015i2p228-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approaches to Solve the Problem of Double-Counting Scientific Articles When Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scientific Organizations: Roundtable Discussion

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Zolotarev

    (Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

Abstract

Approaches to the counting of scientific articles are discussed. Principal attention in the report is paid to fractional counting. It is designated that the method of proportional fractional counting conceptually splits up a scientific result if an article is written by several authors. A combination of proportional fractional counting based on normalization of the affiliations of each article’s author(s), and equal fractional counting based on crossing arrays is suggested. This may have a positive effect, combining the information on an organization’s share of articles and the most valuable collaborations. Participants have pointed that the further research of the raised questions is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Zolotarev, 2015. "Approaches to Solve the Problem of Double-Counting Scientific Articles When Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scientific Organizations: Roundtable Discussion," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 10(2), pages 228-242, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:228-242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2015/18_13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitry Zolotarev, 2016. "The Analysis of Some Aspects of Fractional Counting of Scientific Articles," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 11(1), pages 105-114, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:228-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lubov Pudovkina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://riep.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.