IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aka/aoecon/v64y2014isupplement2p127-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the athlete’s sports learning effect based on leader-member exchange theory — college class A team of Taiwan as example

Author

Listed:
  • Pai-Yeh Lin

    (Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Department of Exercise and Health Promotion, Changhua County 510, Taiwan, R.O.C.)

  • Ching-Lung Hsieh

    (Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Office of Continuing Education, Changhua County 510, Taiwan, R.O.C.)

  • Chia-Liu Chang

    (Chung Chou University of Science and Technology Department of Exercise and Health Promotion Changhua County 510 Taiwan, R.O.C.)

  • Chih-Hsiang Hung

    (Taipei Medical University Office of Physical Education Affairs, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Taiwan R.O.C.)

Abstract

Recently, since there has been more intense competition among teams or players, a team has to reconsider a new strategy for strengthening their competitive advantage. This study tries to explore the relationship among the relationship trust, relationship learning and sports learning effect, which chose Taiwan’s college class A team as subject to do empirical study. We adopted purposive sampling and delivered the questionnaire in a total of 1,000 copies. The duration was from October 1st to 10th of 2009. The valid samples amounted to 459, valid rate up to 45.9%. We used structural equation model (SEM) to test the model fitness and the hypotheses.The results show: (1) “specific assets”, “internal complexity”, “environmental uncertainty”, “communication” and “commitment“ can positively affect the “relationship learning”; (2) the hypothesis presuming “specific assets”, “communication” and “perceived satisfaction”, “commitment” and “dependency” can positively affect the “relationship trust” is supported. In addition, the hypothesis presuming“behavioral uncertainty” negatively affects the “relationship trust” is not supported. The both-sides negotiation based on common benefit is the main reason for behavior and record adjustment of coaches and players in a college class team. Thus, the possibility of distrust can be declined and the relationship between the “behavioral uncertainty” and “relationship trust” proves nonsignificant; (3) the hypotheses presuming the “relationship learning” and “relationship trust” can positively affect the “learning effect” and the “relationship trust” can positively affect “relationship learning” are both supported; (4) the hypothesis presuming the “higher degree of trust will decline positive effect of the relationship learning and learning effect” is not supported. The reason is that the coach and players have the common benefit and the team also establishes a good and completed motivation system; thus, it can reduce the potential problem whereby the traditional business partners generally filter the negative or critical information, even the opportunistic behavior. According to these results, we further provide recommendations and hope these could be a reference for the coach in real training; moreover, can they improve the effect of the whole training and achieve the goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Pai-Yeh Lin & Ching-Lung Hsieh & Chia-Liu Chang & Chih-Hsiang Hung, 2014. "Exploring the athlete’s sports learning effect based on leader-member exchange theory — college class A team of Taiwan as example," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 64(supplemen), pages 127-149, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aka:aoecon:v:64:y:2014:i:supplement2:p:127-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://akademiai.com/content/c308r24029584547/fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: subscription
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aka:aoecon:v:64:y:2014:i:supplement2:p:127-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kriston, Orsolya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://akademiai.hu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.