IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/jocrss/v7y2025i2p19-33id7178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of performance measurement system operational management: Case study ETO manufacturing company

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Farahatan
  • Dermawan Wibisiono

Abstract

This research evaluates the performance measurement system of PT. Hegarmanah (disguised), as a case study of an Engineer-to-Order (ETO) manufacturing company that supplies High Voltage Products and Services and has found inefficiencies in inventory workflows and its misaligned suppliers. Despite robust sales supported by centralized procurement’s customers, PT. Hegarmanah faced internal issues that hindered the development of new Knowledge-based Performance Measurement Systems. This study conducted semi-structured interviews with operational and senior management representatives as part of a qualitative case study approach. The Knowledge-Based Performance Management System (KBPMS) framework was implemented, with an emphasis on specific resource capabilities, internal processes, and organizational output. The results indicated inefficiencies in inventory turnover that were caused by inadequate workflow management, insufficient supplier performance monitoring, and restricted operational cooperation. The suggested KBPMS system aims to improve team performance through smart-factory capabilities and workload optimization, expedite inventory workflows through ERP integration, and strengthen supplier data accuracy. The proposed IPMS framework addresses operational inefficiencies. Thus, a tailored performance management framework for engineer-to-order manufacturers, through the online implementation of performance measures and the enhancement of accountability, may enhance operational sustainability and align inventory practices with corporate objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Farahatan & Dermawan Wibisiono, 2025. "An evaluation of performance measurement system operational management: Case study ETO manufacturing company," Journal of Contemporary Research in Social Sciences, Learning Gate, vol. 7(2), pages 19-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:jocrss:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:19-33:id:7178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0249/article/view/7178/2501
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:jocrss:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:19-33:id:7178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Laurence (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0249/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.