Author
Abstract
Desertification is a phenomenon of natural environmental degradation that threatens ecosystems globally. Numerous studies have explored the natural and human factors contributing to environmental degradation. Human activities can potentially accelerate or mitigate environmental degradation, particularly in marginal areas. When resources in these areas fail to meet the needs of local populations, human migration ensues, leading to the loss of vital human potential necessary for preserving biodiversity and ecosystems. This migration accelerates environmental degradation. Therefore, addressing the needs of local residents and improving their standard of living by leveraging the natural environment’s potential is crucial. This approach fosters a strong connection between the population and their communities, encouraging efforts to preserve and develop environmental resources as a foundation for sustainability. Consequently, strategies for developing marginal areas and conserving their environmental and human resources should be prioritized in policies aimed at combating environmental degradation and the associated desertification problems linked to human migration. Discussing development projects based on community participation as an approach to growth in isolated areas to protect them from environmental degradation with a comparative analysis methodology, examining five case studies from Arab, regional, and international contexts in similar areas. The aim is to identify their characteristics and success factors, highlighting the role of community partnership in conserving the environment. Various aspects are discussed, including the administrative structure, participating parties in financing, strategies, scope of work, and the returns and benefits from these experiences, followed by a deductive approach to extract research results from the outputs of the previous analysis processes.
Suggested Citation
Mohamad Jalal Istanbouli, 2025.
"Community partnership as an approach to reducing environmental degradation,"
Journal of Contemporary Research in Social Sciences, Learning Gate, vol. 7(2), pages 107-125.
Handle:
RePEc:ajp:jocrss:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:107-125:id:11213
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:jocrss:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:107-125:id:11213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Laurence (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0249/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.