IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/jocrss/v3y2021i3p62-68id143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Narrating Peer Assessment in a Group Task

Author

Listed:
  • Ramesh Rao Ramanaidu
  • Edna Shamani Wellington

Abstract

COVID19 interrupted many things in our life. To curb the spread of the virus, Movement Control Order (MOC) was enforced. Though face to face teaching and learning came to halt, was replaced by online learning. In the context of teaching and learning, teachers face a lot of problem in carrying out practices which were a norm before. This study intends to explore a group work, which was carried out during the pandemic. More importantly, on how to assess a group work, which was carried out online, is explored. The aim of this study is to reveal how a peer assessment, for a group task was carried out during the pandemic. Instead of students, 30 music pre-service teachers were involved in this study. They were divided into ten groups. These pre-service teachers were enrolled in a music pedagogy course. One of the tasks involves a group work. Each group is required to produce a video. The video is assessed based on three criteria i.e content of the video, creativity and group collaboration. Each pre-service teacher assessed another group’s video using these criteria. Descriptive statistics and web analysis were used to analyse the scores given by the pre-service teachers. The result revealed that the component of creativity is viewed differently by many pre-service teachers, compared to the other two.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramesh Rao Ramanaidu & Edna Shamani Wellington, 2021. "Narrating Peer Assessment in a Group Task," Journal of Contemporary Research in Social Sciences, Learning Gate, vol. 3(3), pages 62-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:jocrss:v:3:y:2021:i:3:p:62-68:id:143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0249/article/view/143/72
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0249/article/view/143/232
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:jocrss:v:3:y:2021:i:3:p:62-68:id:143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Laurence (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0249/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.