IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/jocrss/v2y2020i5p89-118id66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job Satisfaction Measurement Tool for Public Sector Executives Case Study: Customs Officers in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos M. Karyotakis
  • Eleni I. Barda

Abstract

Job satisfaction constitutes a significant section of research because it is connected to many direct and indirect consequences of an organization. In a constantly changing environment, where the financial situation sets its own restrictions, factors which increase job satisfaction are sought without wanting to receive monetary gain. As a case study, primary data was gathered from a questionnaire filled out by the Customs Officers (public servants) of Greece. A random sample of six hundred and seventy-nine (679) public employees responded to the questionnaire. The data was processed and analyzed through the IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) and grouped by new hyper variables, as a result of Factor Analysis. The results showed that, apart from the financial factors (in which the present study does not refer to), employees derive contentment from work participation, nature of work, value of recognition, evaluation, promotion, and good relations between colleagues and manager. The degree of satisfaction gained from each category is different, and in most cases is open to improvement. Leaders are invited to seek ways to develop each category listed above by specifying which needs the most attention and changing certain practices in place, driving to organizational change and transformation. All in all, by putting into practice the suggestions listed above, a solution can be found without added financial costs, and will ultimately benefit the work situation for civil servants, the economy, and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos M. Karyotakis & Eleni I. Barda, 2020. "Job Satisfaction Measurement Tool for Public Sector Executives Case Study: Customs Officers in Greece," Journal of Contemporary Research in Social Sciences, Learning Gate, vol. 2(5), pages 89-118.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:jocrss:v:2:y:2020:i:5:p:89-118:id:66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0249/article/view/66/46
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:jocrss:v:2:y:2020:i:5:p:89-118:id:66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Laurence (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0249/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.