Author
Listed:
- Siyu Chen
- Nan Zhang
- Shi Yin
Abstract
Rural household waste management is essential for rural revitalization and ecological civilization, significantly impacting habitat improvement, resource recycling, and farmers' ecological benefits. This study systematically reviews research on farmers' participation in waste classification to clarify existing findings, identify gaps, and guide future research and practice. The research employs a standardized literature review method, analyzing studies through the "psychology-behavior-institution" framework. This tripartite approach examines micro-level individual psychology, meso-level social capital networks, macro-level policy environments, and their interactive dimensions. Digital literacy serves as a critical catalyst in bridging the intention-behavior gap, enhancing sorting through improved environmental awareness and information access. Informational policy tools operate via affective event theory pathways, though their effectiveness is moderated by individual characteristics and regulations, with rigid tools posing limitations. Psychological variables demonstrate configurational and grouping effects, where combinations better explain behavioral differences than isolated factors. The government bears primary cost responsibility, while effective governance requires institutional integrity, multi-agent synergy, and income-adjusted cost-sharing mechanisms. This review highlights that effective rural waste governance requires integrated strategies prioritizing digital empowerment to bridge participation gaps and flexible approaches to accommodate regional heterogeneity. Policymakers should develop income-adjusted cost-sharing mechanisms with government leadership, leverage social capital networks while mitigating biases through formal institutions, and implement differentiated interventions. Crucially, transitioning from rigid campaigns to sustainable co-governance models—combining community-driven rules with smart monitoring—can transform administrative mandates into autonomous actions, fostering ecological revitalization.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:jcrbef:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:40-55:id:9228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Laurence (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0265/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.