IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/jcrbef/v7y2025i2p137-151id10863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From colleagues to Cobots: How workplace AI rewrites culture for better and worse

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent English

  • Brian Kenny

Abstract

This study synthesizes empirical evidence on how workplace artificial intelligence (AI)—ranging from collaborative robots to algorithmic management—restructures organizational culture, identity, and power dynamics. A PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis of seven databases and grey literature identified 88 empirical studies conducted between 2015 and 2025. The evidence was integrated through thematic synthesis complemented by a descriptive quantitative summary. The findings converge on five key themes: AI simultaneously threatens and enables work identities; it reconfigures social dynamics by fostering collaboration while also introducing strain; it shifts power toward data-driven control and surveillance; it accelerates human–AI augmentation and job redesign; and it produces uneven cultural adaptation characterized by fear, resistance, and fragile trust. Outcomes are consistently moderated by factors such as leadership quality, organizational support, participatory implementation, and system transparency. The evidence indicates that AI is not culturally neutral; its cultural consequences depend heavily on governance and implementation choices. Practically, organizations should implement transparent communication strategies, involve workers in co-design processes, establish robust ethical and privacy safeguards, and promote targeted upskilling and AI literacy. These measures aim to translate efficiency gains into cultural value while safeguarding autonomy and well-being. Such approaches foster trust and support sustainable performance and cultural resilience in AI-enabled workplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent English & Brian Kenny, 2025. "From colleagues to Cobots: How workplace AI rewrites culture for better and worse," Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Economics and Finance, Learning Gate, vol. 7(2), pages 137-151.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:jcrbef:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:137-151:id:10863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0265/article/view/10863/3493
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:jcrbef:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:137-151:id:10863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Laurence (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0265/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.