IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i9p97-108id9772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-case study on the legitimacy construction of female successors in strategic innovation and green transition of petrochemical family enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Xueping HU

Abstract

This study investigates how female successors in family-owned petrochemical and high-carbon enterprises construct leadership legitimacy while promoting strategic innovation and green transformation. Drawing on legitimacy theory and institutional work, the research addresses a critical gap at the intersection of gender, family business succession, and environmental strategy. Through a qualitative multiple-case study of three female-led organizations—Hengli Group (China), Solvay (Belgium), and S.W. Jack Drilling Co. (United States)—the analysis reveals differentiated pathways of legitimacy construction across pragmatic, moral, and cognitive dimensions. The findings show that female successors deploy strategic narratives, institutional embedding, and stakeholder alignment to reconcile traditional family expectations with forward-looking environmental agendas. While gender remains a latent factor in leadership perception, legitimacy is often achieved through professional normalization and symbolic continuity rather than direct gender appeals. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how gendered actors engage in institutional work within male-dominated legacy industries and offers theoretical and practical insights for succession planning, ESG leadership, and sustainable transformation in family enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Xueping HU, 2025. "A multi-case study on the legitimacy construction of female successors in strategic innovation and green transition of petrochemical family enterprises," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(9), pages 97-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:9:p:97-108:id:9772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/9772/3193
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:9:p:97-108:id:9772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.