IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i9p296-308id9801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limitation of freedom of expression by online media in Malaysia: Analysis of legal precedents

Author

Listed:
  • Suzarika Sahak

  • Ramalinggam Rajamanickam

  • Muhamad Sayuti Hassan

Abstract

Media freedom is a cornerstone of democratic societies, yet it is often shaped by legal precedents and regulatory frameworks. This article examines the relationship between Malaysian laws and online media freedom of expression, based on the 2021 landmark decision in the Malaysiakini case. The objective of this article is to explore the indistinct line between immunity and liability of internet intermediaries that assume the role of content publishers and to scrutinize how legal frameworks and judicial interpretations shape the landscape of online media freedom in Malaysia. This article also examines statutory provisions such as the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, the Communications and Multimedia Content Code, and the newly enacted Online Safety Act 2025. In addition, the study offers a comparative analysis with European Court of Human Rights rulings, as well as insights from the United Kingdom and India on intermediaries. The analysis demonstrates that the Malaysiakini ruling expanded the scope of liability for online platforms by applying Section 114A of the Evidence Act 1950, raising the standard of editorial responsibility. While the decision partly aligns with international approaches, gaps remain in providing coherent protections for media freedom. This article proposes that clear guidelines should be developed to find appropriate measures to protect and balance internet freedom and online media’s freedom of expression.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzarika Sahak & Ramalinggam Rajamanickam & Muhamad Sayuti Hassan, 2025. "The limitation of freedom of expression by online media in Malaysia: Analysis of legal precedents," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(9), pages 296-308.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:9:p:296-308:id:9801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/9801/3207
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:9:p:296-308:id:9801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.