IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i9p130-143id9774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital agriculture’s equalization effect in the Yangtze River economic belt: An empirical study using difference-in-difference analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiongfei Bi

Abstract

To achieve common prosperity in China, digital agricultural transformation is increasingly important in narrowing the income gap and promoting rural revitalization. Based on a quasi-natural experiment involving digital agriculture pilot projects in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, this paper systematically evaluates the impact of digital agriculture policies on common prosperity using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2012 to 2022, employing a difference-in-difference (DID) approach. The study finds that digital agriculture policies significantly reduce residents’ subjective perceptions of income inequality, with a particularly significant effect in the central and western regions and among households engaged in agriculture. Mechanism analysis suggests that the policies form a positive chain of pathways that mitigate income inequality by improving the modernization of agricultural production tools, optimizing resource allocation efficiency, and increasing farmers’ income. Heterogeneity analysis reveals significant heterogeneity in policy effects across regions and population groups. The marginal utility of the policies is higher in the central and western regions due to their weak agricultural foundations, while the incremental effect is relatively limited in the eastern region due to its advanced agricultural modernization. This study provides empirical evidence for digital agriculture’s contribution to common prosperity and offers a reference for policymakers to optimize digital agriculture promotion strategies and promote balanced regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiongfei Bi, 2025. "Digital agriculture’s equalization effect in the Yangtze River economic belt: An empirical study using difference-in-difference analysis," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(9), pages 130-143.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:9:p:130-143:id:9774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/9774/3195
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:9:p:130-143:id:9774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.