IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i8p913-924id9489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in higher education through AI-supported flipped classrooms: A mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Cam Ai Tran
  • Hung Tran Van
  • Ha Thu Thi Nguyen
  • Phuong Ba Le
  • Trung Tran

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has opened new opportunities for enhancing teaching models, notably the flipped classroom (FC). This study investigates the impact of an AI-supported flipped classroom model on student engagement and learning outcomes among university students in Vietnam. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, in which quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-tests, and qualitative insights were obtained via in-depth interviews. The AI tools used included automated video summarization, intelligent quiz generation, and personalized feedback systems integrated into the learning management system (LMS). Quantitative results from 210 undergraduate students revealed statistically significant improvements in academic performance and learner satisfaction. Specifically, the experimental group’s post-test scores improved by an average of 2.1 points, compared to a 1.2-point improvement in the control group (p < .001), and emotional engagement increased by 16% over baseline. Thematic analysis of qualitative data highlighted increased motivation, self-regulated learning, and positive attitudes toward AI-enhanced instruction. The study concludes that the integration of AI in FC models fosters active learning, autonomy, and deeper engagement, contributing to improved educational effectiveness in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Cam Ai Tran & Hung Tran Van & Ha Thu Thi Nguyen & Phuong Ba Le & Trung Tran, 2025. "Enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in higher education through AI-supported flipped classrooms: A mixed-methods study," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(8), pages 913-924.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:913-924:id:9489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/9489/3112
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:913-924:id:9489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.