IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i8p775-784id9435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A literature review of netizens' online public opinion dissemination behavior on food safety

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaopei Li
  • Zunirah Mohd Talib

Abstract

This paper reviews the current status of research on the dissemination behavior of Chinese netizens regarding food safety in recent years. It identifies the progress made and existing problems, providing practical guidance for relevant authorities to develop targeted governance strategies. This is of significant importance for optimizing the public opinion governance system related to food safety. A systematic review methodology was employed to organize recent research findings, with in-depth analysis conducted across several dimensions, including the theoretical framework, influencing factors, dissemination pathways, and the characteristics of netizens' public opinion dissemination behavior concerning food safety. The dissemination behavior of netizens is driven by multiple factors such as the credibility of information, emotional appeal, and social trust. The dissemination pathways exhibit features of fragmentation, circle-based sharing, and cross-platform dissemination. Future research should focus on understanding the influence mechanisms of emerging platforms, the dynamic evolution of netizens' psychology, and the integration of interdisciplinary theories. These efforts will help establish a solid foundation for enhancing the public opinion governance system related to food safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaopei Li & Zunirah Mohd Talib, 2025. "A literature review of netizens' online public opinion dissemination behavior on food safety," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(8), pages 775-784.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:775-784:id:9435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/9435/3099
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:775-784:id:9435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.