IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i8p624-640id9393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of deep learning models for post-roasting coffee bean classification

Author

Listed:
  • Faiza Osama Abdalla Hashim
  • Boon Chin Yeo
  • Boon Chin Yeo
  • Akaraphunt Vongkunghae
  • Way Soong Lim
  • Jiraporn Pooksook
  • Kia Wai Liew
  • Jakir Hossen

Abstract

The classification of coffee beans is crucial for maintaining quality and consistency within the coffee industry. Manual inspection, however, is labor-intensive, error-prone, and susceptible to human biases. To address these challenges, this study aims to automate coffee bean classification using deep learning models to improve accuracy and efficiency. Four pre-trained models—Xception, ResNet50V2, EfficientNetB0, and VGG16—were evaluated for predicting post-roasting coffee bean quality based on two datasets: a Kaggle dataset and a self-collected dataset with an image scanner. The datasets included images of coffee beans at four roast levels: dark, green, light, and medium. The models were trained and tested using standard deep learning techniques, with performance assessed through metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results demonstrated that Xception and EfficientNetB0 achieved the highest classification performance. On the Kaggle dataset, both models achieved 100% accuracy, while on the self-collected dataset, Xception achieved 99.3%, and EfficientNetB0 achieved 99.07%. These findings underscore the robustness of applying deep learning models in automating coffee quality control, reducing human intervention, and enhancing classification reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Faiza Osama Abdalla Hashim & Boon Chin Yeo & Boon Chin Yeo & Akaraphunt Vongkunghae & Way Soong Lim & Jiraporn Pooksook & Kia Wai Liew & Jakir Hossen, 2025. "Comparative analysis of deep learning models for post-roasting coffee bean classification," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(8), pages 624-640.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:624-640:id:9393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/9393/3087
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:624-640:id:9393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.