IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i8p1464-1497id9644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge graphs for domain-specific teaching and learning - a systematic review of the construction models and evaluation methods

Author

Listed:
  • Akinyinka Tosin Akindele

  • Sunday O. Ojo

Abstract

Knowledge Graphs are structured representations of knowledge that capture concepts and their relationships, facilitating informed decision-making, enhancing efficiency, and enriching learning experiences across various educational contexts. Although interest in Knowledge Graphs (KGs) for teaching and learning (T&L) is increasing, systematic reviews of the latest models, baseline comparisons, and evaluation methods remain limited. This systematic literature review (SLR) aims to address this gap by analyzing the underlying models, baseline algorithms, and evaluation techniques used in the field. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across five major databases—Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore—resulting in the identification of 34 relevant articles published between 2018 and 2024. These articles focus on domain-specific KGs applied explicitly to T&L activities. The applications of KGs are categorized into three main areas: Recommendation and Personalized Learning, Concept Mapping and Knowledge Organization, and Information Retrieval and Question Answering. The synthesis of results indicates that deep learning models—particularly BERT and its variants, BiLSTM, and Conditional Random Fields (CRF)—are predominant in knowledge extraction processes. Additionally, Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) techniques and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), such as Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) and Graph Attention Networks (GATs), are extensively utilized. The review also highlights several limitations, including data scarcity, issues with generalizability, and a lack of standardization. To advance the development of educational KGs, future research should focus on automated data extraction from heterogeneous sources, standardized approaches for entity extraction, consistent evaluation and benchmarking methods, improved interoperability and scalability, as well as enhanced explainability and privacy-preserving techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Akinyinka Tosin Akindele & Sunday O. Ojo, 2025. "Knowledge graphs for domain-specific teaching and learning - a systematic review of the construction models and evaluation methods," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(8), pages 1464-1497.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:1464-1497:id:9644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/9644/3153
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:1464-1497:id:9644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.