IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i8p1039-1068id9542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How green finance drives innovation: An empirical analysis based on urban efficiency evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Siyao Liu

Abstract

Based on balanced panel data of 284 prefecture-level cities in China from 2007 to 2021, this paper employs the SBM-DEA model, which is based on a two-stage value chain perspective, to measure green technology efficiency (GTE) and green result efficiency (GRE). The study utilizes fixed effect panel models (FE), dynamic threshold models, and spatial Durbin models (SDM) to explore the mechanisms and effects of green finance on GTE and GRE. The results indicate that green finance significantly improves both GTE and GRE: for every 1% increase in green finance, GTE and GRE increase by 0.203% and 0.258%, respectively. These findings remain robust under various tests for endogeneity and sensitivity. Green finance primarily enhances GTE by alleviating financing constraints and stimulating social consumption. Additionally, formal and informal environmental regulations significantly strengthen the impact of green finance on GTE and GRE. When using green finance as a threshold variable, the analysis reveals a nonlinear increasing effect on both GTE and GRE. Furthermore, green finance exhibits spatial spillover effects on GTE and GRE and demonstrates significant spatio-temporal heterogeneity. This study contributes to understanding and promoting the application of green finance in supporting rural revitalization and smart agricultural energy solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyao Liu, 2025. "How green finance drives innovation: An empirical analysis based on urban efficiency evaluation," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(8), pages 1039-1068.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:1039-1068:id:9542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/9542/3123
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:8:p:1039-1068:id:9542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.