IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i7p93-110id8539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A machine learning-based classification of monocultivar olive oils—specifically Kalinjot, Ulli i bardhë Tirana, and Mixan—comparing their chemical composition

Author

Listed:
  • Ardiana Topi
  • Erdet Këlliçi
  • Daniel Hudhra
  • Dritan Topi

Abstract

Valued for its nutritional and economic value, olive oil (OO) has been subject to adulteration practices. This study aimed to develop a classification model based on chemical composition to identify OOs from three main cultivars: Kalinjot, Ulli i bardhë Tirana, and Mixan, which comprise the majority of plantations in Albania. Eighty-five OO samples spanning different crop years and locations were studied using three different machine-learning algorithm models. The performance metrics of the k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest are discussed in terms of their classification performance. The comparison of accuracy revealed that the Random Forest model outperformed the others, achieving an accuracy of approximately 93%, compared to 81% for kNN and 78% for SVM. This significant finding, along with the clear confusion matrix of Random Forest, selects it as the preferred model for distinguishing OO based on cultivar and geographic origin. This project will help oil and oil extraction companies verify the authenticity of their products and detect adulteration practices in the Albanian oil sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ardiana Topi & Erdet Këlliçi & Daniel Hudhra & Dritan Topi, 2025. "A machine learning-based classification of monocultivar olive oils—specifically Kalinjot, Ulli i bardhë Tirana, and Mixan—comparing their chemical composition," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(7), pages 93-110.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:93-110:id:8539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/8539/2869
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:93-110:id:8539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.