IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i7p622-635id8685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence from digital-based freelancer

Author

Listed:
  • Aynun Mardiyah
  • Alisa Salmavira
  • Fany Inasius

Abstract

The Slippery Slope Framework demonstrates that tax compliance behavior is influenced by the dimensions of trust and power within the relationship between taxpayers and the government. Although the framework has been tested by numerous empirical studies, there remains a lack of research focusing on shadow economy actors. Therefore, this study aims to examine the existence of these dimensions and their influence on the perception of tax compliance among digital-based freelancers in Indonesia. A total of 408 digital freelancers participated in an online questionnaire survey, and the data were analyzed using a stepwise linear regression model. The results indicated that perceived government power was positively correlated with approval of voluntary tax compliance. However, the study did not find a significant effect of perceived government power or trust in government on enforced tax compliance. The Slippery Slope Framework is only partially supported by these data. The purpose of this study is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge regarding the impact of power and trust on voluntary and enforced tax compliance in developing countries dealing with a shadow economy, particularly in Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Aynun Mardiyah & Alisa Salmavira & Fany Inasius, 2025. "Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence from digital-based freelancer," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(7), pages 622-635.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:622-635:id:8685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/8685/2909
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:622-635:id:8685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.