IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i7p176-187id8558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the influence of cultural distance on export of traditional Chinese medicine products - based on the empirical analysis of countries along the belt and road

Author

Listed:
  • Zhengwei Wang
  • Youxu Leng

Abstract

In this era, when people are increasingly concerned about health, traditional Chinese medicine, with its unique theories and rich practical experience, has gradually increased its influence in the global health field. Against this background, this article focuses on conducting an in-depth exploration of the influencing factors of cultural distance on the trade of traditional Chinese medicine products between China and the countries along the "Belt and Road." Cultural differences (CD) have had a significant negative impact on the trade volume of traditional Chinese medicine products. That is to say, the greater the degree of cultural differences, the lower the trade volume of traditional Chinese medicine products. This fully indicates that cultural differences have formed certain obstacles in the trade of traditional Chinese medicine. Among the numerous control variables, gross domestic product (GDP) and per capita gross national income (GNI) of trading countries show a positive correlation with the volume of trade. This implies that sustained economic development and the relatively high income level of residents in these countries can effectively promote the import of traditional Chinese medicine products. Conversely, geographical distance (DIS) has brought negative effects to trade. Due to increased distance, trade costs rise, which in turn suppresses the export of traditional Chinese medicine products. Furthermore, common language (LAN) and population size (POP) have also played a promoting role in trade, with the role of common language being more crucial. Although the effect of free trade agreements (FTAs) in promoting trade is not yet fully clear at present, judging from the relatively large coefficient values, they have the potential to drive trade growth. To further analyze the influence mechanism of cultural factors in trade, a mechanism test was carried out in the research. The results show that the Power Distance Index (PDI) presents a significant positive correlation with trade volume. The Individualism and Collectivism Index (IDV), the Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI), and the Indulgence and Restraint Index (IVR) are all significantly negatively correlated with trade volume. The long-term orientation (LTO) is significantly positively correlated with the short-term normative orientation and trade volume. However, the dimensions of masculinity and femininity (MAS) have no obvious influence on trade volume. Through heterogeneity analysis, it was found that cultural differences have a more prominent inhibitory effect on the trade of traditional Chinese medicine in non-high-income countries. High-income countries, relying on their own advantages and with the assistance of economic factors that promote trade and a common language, can obtain more trade dividends. Meanwhile, geographical distance poses a more serious trade obstacle for non-high-income countries. These research results comprehensively and deeply reveal the intricate relationship between cultural distance and the trade of traditional Chinese medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhengwei Wang & Youxu Leng, 2025. "Research on the influence of cultural distance on export of traditional Chinese medicine products - based on the empirical analysis of countries along the belt and road," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(7), pages 176-187.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:176-187:id:8558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/8558/2876
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:176-187:id:8558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.