Author
Listed:
- Faizal Ariffianto Soehadak
- Vincent Gunawan
- Rio Yudistira Christianto
- Heri Suroto
Abstract
Proximal humeral fracture (PHF), with an incidence rate of 266: 100.000 people, is a common and challenging fracture. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is an option for managing it by using a proximal humeral plate or Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) if shoulder arthroplasty is being considered. We report a 66-year-old male with a 3-part PHF initially treated with ORIF. Twenty-six months later, the patient developed non-union with humeral head osteonecrosis (HHO), leading to RTSA. After initial improvement, he presented 40 months post-RTSA with shoulder dysfunction following a massage. Imaging revealed implant failure. Revision surgery showed wear of the metaphyseal component and soft tissue metallosis. The component was replaced, and the tissue debrided. Postoperatively, the patient experienced mild pain with improved but limited shoulder motion. This case illustrates multiple complications in PHF management, including fixation failure and HHO due to lack of medial calcar support. Despite literature supporting RTSA over ORIF in older patients, implant design and bone loss remain significant factors for RTSA failure. Metallosis, although rare, may arise from component wear and should be considered in revision planning. In managing PHF, medial calcar support restoration should be done to minimize the risk of HHO, especially in elderly osteoporotic bone. When HHO occurs, osteosynthesis could be converted to RTSA. In the case of RTSA, further research is needed to minimize the risk of implant failure, reoperation, and especially metallosis because an extensive debridement can lead to instability.
Suggested Citation
Faizal Ariffianto Soehadak & Vincent Gunawan & Rio Yudistira Christianto & Heri Suroto, 2025.
"Proximal humerus fixation failure for 3 parts proximal humeral fracture in plating and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A case report,"
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(7), pages 1476-1481.
Handle:
RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:1476-1481:id:8943
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:1476-1481:id:8943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.