IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i7p1145-1165id8842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reforming police human capital management through functional positions and competency-based appraisal systems: A systematic review (2020-2025)

Author

Listed:
  • Bagus Panuntun
  • Arthur Josias Simon Runturambi

Abstract

Strengthening the competence and professionalism of police officers is a strategic issue in security sector institutional reform in the era of disruption. This study aims to identify, synthesize, and systematically analyze scientific literature published between 2020 and 2025 that discusses functional position models and competency-based performance appraisal systems within the context of the National Police. A systematic literature review (SLR) approach was employed, guided by the PRISMA protocol, resulting in 87 articles selected from five internationally reputable databases. Thematic analysis grouped the findings into four main areas: competency enhancement, appraisal systems, restructuring of functional positions, and institutional integration. The results indicate a predominance of qualitative and mixed-methods approaches, with significant attention given to psychosocial well-being, equity in evaluation, and transformative leadership. The absence of an integrative model that systematically combines these three aspects reveals a conceptual gap in the literature. This study contributes a synthesized framework that integrates the technocratic and humanistic dimensions of police HRM and recommends an evidence-based, interdisciplinary research agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Bagus Panuntun & Arthur Josias Simon Runturambi, 2025. "Reforming police human capital management through functional positions and competency-based appraisal systems: A systematic review (2020-2025)," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(7), pages 1145-1165.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:1145-1165:id:8842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/8842/2948
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:1145-1165:id:8842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.