Author
Listed:
- Aloysius Dewanto Handoko
- Ningrum Natasya Sirait
- Mahmul Siregar
- Mirza Nasution
Abstract
Investment is the backbone of economic growth. Unfortunately, the Indonesian government has never implemented appropriate regulations to promote investment as a strategy for achieving public welfare. This research employed a normative legal research method involving the examination of various documents based on secondary data sources. Data was obtained through a literature study of legal source materials consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. This research takes a prescriptive approach by addressing legal issues arising from the lack of consideration for the interests of the general public, who have not yet achieved prosperity, proposing that these interests serve as a paradigm in formulating all economic regulations, particularly in the investment sector. Due to this absence, the government faces disorientation in its efforts to promote public welfare. Therefore, recommendations are proposed as strategic solutions to initiate reforms in investment law, ensuring a more equitable framework that benefits all segments of society and supports the advancement of general welfare. This article inquires whether the establishment of Badan Pengelola Investasi Daya Anagata Nusantara or Danantara Indonesia by the government is the right step to encourage investment in order to advance public welfare. Using normative legal research methods, the research findings show that regulations pertaining to investment in Indonesia only favor the interests of large-scale businesses (corporations), thus ignoring the interests of the wider community. For this reason, it is recommended that the government carry out fundamental legal reforms to various regulations in the field of investment to realize public welfare.
Suggested Citation
Aloysius Dewanto Handoko & Ningrum Natasya Sirait & Mahmul Siregar & Mirza Nasution, 2025.
"Danantara Indonesia and investment policy disorientation,"
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(7), pages 1091-1099.
Handle:
RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:1091-1099:id:8811
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:7:p:1091-1099:id:8811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.