IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i6p2886-2902id8501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behaviorally anchored rating scales in the performance management system within the centralized policing system in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Faesal Rachmat
  • Eko Prasojo
  • Muh Azis Muslim

Abstract

This study investigates the implementation of Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) in the centralized performance management system of the Indonesian National Police (Polri). The research aims to explore how BARS is operationalized and what challenges emerge within the institutional and cultural framework of Polri. A qualitative case study design was employed, utilizing in-depth interviews and document analysis to collect relevant data. Thematic analysis was applied to identify key patterns, challenges, and areas for improvement in BARS application. The findings indicate several barriers to effective implementation, including insufficient training for evaluators, the use of overly generic behavioral indicators, and the dominance of hierarchical relationships that compromise objectivity. These issues contribute to inconsistencies, limited transparency, and reduced strategic value in performance evaluations. The study concludes that without significant reform, the use of BARS will remain largely formalistic and fail to support meaningful performance improvement. Practical implications include the need for enhanced evaluator capacity building, better contextualization of behavioral indicators, and greater integration of performance data into strategic human resource planning. These adjustments are essential for strengthening organizational accountability, professional standards, and public trust in Indonesia’s law enforcement institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Faesal Rachmat & Eko Prasojo & Muh Azis Muslim, 2025. "Behaviorally anchored rating scales in the performance management system within the centralized policing system in Indonesia," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(6), pages 2886-2902.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:6:p:2886-2902:id:8501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/8501/2857
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:6:p:2886-2902:id:8501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.