IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i6p1320-1330id8104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proposal by reducing the mining social conflicts using the improved multi-criteria assessment model

Author

Listed:
  • Julio G. Poterico
  • Filomón Laurente

Abstract

A methodological tool for multi-criteria impact assessment has been developed for application in the productive-extractive industry, such as mining activity, with the aim of reducing social conflict. This assessment methodology is called the IMCA Model (Improved Multicriteria Assessment). It is a holistic and innovative methodology that includes the quantification of impacts evaluated from a comprehensive approach. Additionally, the IMCA Model offers other advantages; it is a participatory, inclusive, and binding tool, which allows for better and more reliable results aligned with reality due to its traceability for assessing externalities. The IMCA Model methodology encompasses technical-operational, economic, social, cultural, educational, environmental, and governance factors, among others, depending on the project's nature. This methodology also comprises five main assessment phases: 1) Participatory phase, 2) Statistical phase, 3) Application phase of the mathematical algorithm - IMCA Model, 4) Results socialization phase, and 5) Monitoring and surveillance phase. By measuring externalities in the influence areas of a productive-extractive project using the IMCA Model, it becomes a predictive evaluation tool, enabling the design of a sustainable coexistence model with local populations and environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Julio G. Poterico & Filomón Laurente, 2025. "A proposal by reducing the mining social conflicts using the improved multi-criteria assessment model," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(6), pages 1320-1330.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:6:p:1320-1330:id:8104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/8104/2744
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:6:p:1320-1330:id:8104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.