IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i6p1193-1204id8060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is training and development imperative? A bibliometric and systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Abdulmohsen Binmlafikh
  • Shah Rollah Bin Abdul Wahab

Abstract

Training and development play a significant role in improving employee skills and capabilities for higher performance and in producing high-quality work. They are important for ensuring employee efficiency and for organizations to cultivate a professional workforce. The aim of this bibliometric and systematic literature review is to address the research gap and serve as a guideline for policymakers, academicians, and organizations in effectively utilizing training and development. The current study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Systematic Reviews. The Scopus database was used due to its broad journal coverage. A holistic keyword search identified 2,299 articles, and after applying criteria, 169 relevant articles were gathered. Quantitative methods were commonly used, followed by qualitative and mixed methods. Descriptive statistics, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), exploratory factor analysis, and multiple regression were common statistical techniques. This review enriched the literature and suggested future directions for understanding training and development and refining methodological approaches. The study recommends customized methods, innovative technologies, and the integration of AI in training frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Abdulmohsen Binmlafikh & Shah Rollah Bin Abdul Wahab, 2025. "Is training and development imperative? A bibliometric and systematic literature review," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(6), pages 1193-1204.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:6:p:1193-1204:id:8060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/8060/2735
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:6:p:1193-1204:id:8060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.