IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i5p979-992id7045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Myers-Briggs typology from the perspective of classification of natural specializations

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandr Ishkov

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the Myers-Briggs Typology (MBTI), based on psychological characteristics of personality, and the classification of natural specializations (CNS), based on neurophysiological features of the nervous system. The purpose of the study is to identify overlaps, differences, and possible ways of integration and development of these two concepts. On the basis of structural analysis, it was found that the dichotomy “extraversion/introversion” of MBTI corresponds to the dichotomy “concrete/abstract” of CNS. The main functions of MBTI (“sensing,” “intuition,” “thinking,” “feeling”) correspond with the classical specializations of CNS: Searcher, Analyst, Synthetic, and Realizator, respectively. The correlation of sixteen MBTI types with sixteen integral specializations of the CNS was established, which demonstrates the neurophysiological basis of each MBTI type, opening the way to a more objective diagnosis of the types through the methods of neurophysiology. The system comparison of MBTI and CNS demonstrates their structural similarity at different levels of content - psychological and biological. This allows us to consider the MBTI as a private, psychological level of the broader neurophysiological model of the CNS. MBTI and CNS, despite their different approaches and methodologies, describe the same underlying individual differences in humans.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandr Ishkov, 2025. "Myers-Briggs typology from the perspective of classification of natural specializations," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(5), pages 979-992.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:979-992:id:7045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/7045/2462
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:979-992:id:7045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.