IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i5p92-100id6801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Binary logistic analyses on responses of being healthy and unhealthy to positive and negative mindsets in caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Ji-Won Hwang

Abstract

This paper is a descriptive research study on self-perceived evaluations of health in caregivers: (1) It starts with questions about whether caregivers with patients think of being healthy just by themselves. These healthy caregivers have positive mindsets and are less stressed than others; (2) Perceived health status (healthy and unhealthy) was evaluated as a response to factors including demographic characteristics, positive psychological capital, and job stress (negative) using binary logistic analysis; (3) 79 individuals from the perceived good health group were compared with 98 from the perceived poor health group, totaling 177 participants. The mean score of positive psychological capital for the perceived good health group was higher than that of the other group (64.0 ± 8.2 : 61.2 ± 8.0). Additionally, the mean score of job stress for the perceived good health group was lower than that of the other group (98.9 ± 11.0 : 102.2 ± 10.7); (4) In this study, the caregiver group that was healthy had higher positive psychological capital and lower job stress than the other group.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji-Won Hwang, 2025. "Binary logistic analyses on responses of being healthy and unhealthy to positive and negative mindsets in caregivers," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(5), pages 92-100.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:92-100:id:6801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/6801/2393
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:92-100:id:6801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.