IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i5p3343-3356id7703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the role of WeChat in educational communication: Factors, usage patterns, and optimization strategies for e-learning in China

Author

Listed:
  • Lusi Liu
  • Somdech Rungsrisawa

Abstract

This study examines the role of WeChat in educational communication, focusing on factors influencing its adoption, usage patterns, and optimization strategies for e-learning in China. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, we combined quantitative surveys (N=398) with qualitative interviews (n=9 experts) to analyze key variables, including perceived usefulness, ease of use, content quality, and social influence. Quantitative findings, analyzed via structural equation modeling (SEM), revealed that perceived usefulness and satisfaction were the strongest predictors of continuance intention, while qualitative insights highlighted WeChat’s functional utility and social learning dynamics, alongside challenges like information overload. The study confirms WeChat’s effectiveness as a versatile educational tool but underscores the need for improved content curation and user training to mitigate platform limitations. The findings contribute to the literature on mobile learning by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM) within a social media-based educational context. Practical implications suggest that institutions should leverage WeChat’s accessibility while addressing pedagogical constraints through structured content delivery and digital literacy programs. Future research could explore generational differences in adoption and the long-term sustainability of social media-integrated e-learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Lusi Liu & Somdech Rungsrisawa, 2025. "Exploring the role of WeChat in educational communication: Factors, usage patterns, and optimization strategies for e-learning in China," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(5), pages 3343-3356.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:3343-3356:id:7703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/7703/2640
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:3343-3356:id:7703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.