IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i5p3260-3273id7677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of indoor plants vs. HEPA purifiers in the removal of PM2.5 and PM10

Author

Listed:
  • Wilawan Rukpakavong
  • Sirikunya Nilpanich
  • Kannikar Subsomboon

Abstract

Particulate matter (PM) is a major contributor to air pollution in many countries, including Thailand. The use of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters in air purifiers is currently the most common solution. However, in the context of PM removal, it is worth exploring how nature-based technologies could be employed to combat indoor air pollution and support the broader goals of urban sustainability. This study compares the efficiency of HEPA air purifiers with selected dust-collecting indoor plants. For a day, incense sticks were burned nonstop in two enclosed rooms with air purifiers and another with plants that reduce dust. PM2.5 and PM10 levels were monitored until the air quality met safety standards. The results indicated that plants with rough, hairy surfaces, bush-like shapes, and large leaf surface areas collected the most dust. Among the tested species, Boston Fern and Monstera demonstrated the highest air-cleaning efficiency per square meter of leaf area per hour. By contrast, in heavily polluted conditions (e.g., due to incense burning), it took the plants approximately 1.67–3.55 times longer for PM2.5 and 2.0–3.6 times longer for PM10 to reach safe levels compared to the air purifiers. These findings provide valuable insights for individuals deciding between air purifiers and indoor plants for improving indoor air quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilawan Rukpakavong & Sirikunya Nilpanich & Kannikar Subsomboon, 2025. "Effectiveness of indoor plants vs. HEPA purifiers in the removal of PM2.5 and PM10," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(5), pages 3260-3273.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:3260-3273:id:7677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/7677/2634
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:3260-3273:id:7677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.