IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i5p239-254id6823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing Chinese Non-English majors' attitudes toward blended learning: The role of perceived relevance, online self-efficacy, and teachers' digital literacy

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Li
  • Nur Ainil Sulaiman
  • Azlina Abdul Aziz

Abstract

Chinese non-English majors frequently disengage from mandatory college English courses—a persistent challenge despite the widespread adoption of blended learning. This study investigates how students’ attitudes toward these technology-enhanced environments are shaped by (1) perceived course relevance, (2) confidence in online learning (self-efficacy), and (3) perceptions of instructors’ digital literacy. Surveying 300 students across six universities in Zhejiang Province, we analyzed responses using structural equation modeling (SEM). Results indicate that perceived relevance exerts the strongest influence on attitudes (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), followed by online self-efficacy (β = 0.34, p < 0.001) and perceived teacher digital literacy (β = 0.27, p < 0.001). Together, these factors explain 52.3% of the variance in student attitudes, underscoring that content relevance outweighs technological sophistication in driving engagement. These findings refine technology acceptance models and offer actionable insights for combating passive disengagement in college English courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Li & Nur Ainil Sulaiman & Azlina Abdul Aziz, 2025. "Factors influencing Chinese Non-English majors' attitudes toward blended learning: The role of perceived relevance, online self-efficacy, and teachers' digital literacy," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(5), pages 239-254.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:239-254:id:6823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/6823/2405
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:239-254:id:6823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.