IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i5p1711-1721id7269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of innovative banking market models and new opportunities for sustainable development between Kyrgyzstan and China under the wave of digital finance

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojiao Wang
  • Kalybek Zh. Abdykadyrov

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the rapid development of digital finance, the banking industries of the Kyrgyz Republic and China face differentiated challenges: Kyrgyzstan is constrained by weak digital infrastructure, an outdated regulatory framework, and low coverage of traditional banking services, while China needs to deal with issues such as saturated market competition, data security risks, and cross-border payment barriers. Through multi-dimensional comparative analysis, this study first collects annual reports of the central banks of the two countries and World Bank data from 2018 to 2023, and quantitatively evaluates core indicators such as mobile payment penetration rates and digital credit scales; secondly, it selects typical institutional cases to deconstruct product innovation models; finally, it uses the SWOT model combined with policy text analysis to find that Kyrgyzstan has reduced the access cost of micro-merchants from US$138 in 2018 to US$36 in 2023 by introducing a QR code payment system, and the cross-border remittance fee has continued to drop from 8.0% in Q1 2018 to 2.3% in Q4 2023, providing a reference for the sustainable development of digital finance along the "Belt and Road".

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojiao Wang & Kalybek Zh. Abdykadyrov, 2025. "Comparison of innovative banking market models and new opportunities for sustainable development between Kyrgyzstan and China under the wave of digital finance," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(5), pages 1711-1721.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:1711-1721:id:7269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/7269/2521
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:5:p:1711-1721:id:7269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.