Author
Listed:
- Ming-Kuo Chen
- Yi-Huang Shih
Abstract
Education serves as a critical instrument for promoting social equity, reducing systemic disparities by creating opportunities for upward mobility and fostering inclusive participation in civic life. Within multicultural contexts such as Taiwan, education also assumes the essential responsibility of sustaining cultural diversity and revitalizing Indigenous knowledge systems. However, the educational experiences of Indigenous peoples have historically been shaped by assimilationist policies that marginalized their languages, cultures, and epistemologies. As Indigenous students transition into higher education, particularly universities, it is vital to examine how their curricular and learning experiences are influenced by underlying power relations and processes of identity construction. Adopting a sociological lens, this article critically investigates these dynamics and reflects on their implications for advancing educational equity and fostering inclusive educational practices. Drawing on the interrelated concepts of power and identity, this article proposes the following strategies for the development of Indigenous curricula in higher education institutions: (1) Curricula should be grounded in Indigenous worldviews and knowledge systems; (2) Indigenous scholars and communities must lead the curriculum development process; (3) The design of curricula should reflect the authentic needs, voices, and lived experiences of Indigenous peoples; (4) Learning experiences that reinforce students’ cultural heritage can support the reconstruction of identity and the development of cultural confidence; (5) Curriculum frameworks must recognize and respect the cultural diversity of Indigenous students and avoid reducing their identities to singular narratives or stereotypical representations.
Suggested Citation
Ming-Kuo Chen & Yi-Huang Shih, 2025.
"A sociological analysis of indigenous curricula in Taiwanese universities: Power and identity,"
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(4), pages 2600-2609.
Handle:
RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:2600-2609:id:6609
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:2600-2609:id:6609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.