IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i4p24-31id5933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User perceptions and intentions to continue using generative AI tools in the design process

Author

Listed:
  • Jhonghee Kim
  • Hyungjoon Kim

Abstract

The integration of generative AI into the design process enhances creativity and optimizes workflows, yet research on user engagement and experiential factors is limited. This study addresses the gap by developing a conceptual model that analyzes designers’ perceptions of AI-assisted workflows, adoption attitudes, and sustained usage intentions. Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a survey was conducted with professionals actively employing generative AI tools. The findings indicate that innovativeness, self-efficacy, perceived enjoyment, and service quality significantly impact perceived usefulness and ease of use, influencing intentions to sustain AI adoption. This research offers insights into the long-term integration of generative AI in design, contributing to both academic discourse and practical applications while informing future research on AI-enhanced design methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhonghee Kim & Hyungjoon Kim, 2025. "User perceptions and intentions to continue using generative AI tools in the design process," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(4), pages 24-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:24-31:id:5933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/5933/2131
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:24-31:id:5933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.