Author
Listed:
- Racz Aleksandar
- Vasiljev Vanja
- Rukavina Tomislav
- Hošnjak Ana Marija
- Armano Ljerka
Abstract
Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is increasingly utilized in oncology care; however, significant disparities exist regarding the trusted sources of CAM information among oncology patients and healthcare professionals. This study aimed to systematically evaluate these information sources, their credibility, and their influence on medical decision-making. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Sisters of Mercy University Hospital Center in Zagreb from November 2022 to May 2023. The sample consisted of 832 respondents, comprising 411 oncology patients and 421 healthcare professionals, including 100 physicians, 321 nurses, and technicians. Data were collected using a survey questionnaire based on modified CHBQ and IMAQ instruments. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were applied, including one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test to identify differences among groups. The most common sources of CAM information for patients were family and friends (82.6%), while healthcare professionals were more inclined to use the internet and media (61.4%). Statistically significant differences in attitudes were identified between patients and healthcare professionals regarding their information sources (p < 0.05). These findings underscore a pressing need for standardized, evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) education that is tailored to both patients and healthcare providers. Addressing these disparities through targeted educational interventions could enhance informed decision-making, reduce misinformation, and optimize the delivery of integrative oncology care. Future research should focus on developing verified CAM information frameworks to ensure a more consistent and scientifically grounded approach in oncology settings.
Suggested Citation
Racz Aleksandar & Vasiljev Vanja & Rukavina Tomislav & Hošnjak Ana Marija & Armano Ljerka, 2025.
"Sources of information about complementary and alternative medicine commonly used by oncology patients and healthcare professionals,"
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(4), pages 1265-1275.
Handle:
RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:1265-1275:id:6231
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:1265-1275:id:6231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.