IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i4p1032-1049id6169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are AI tools biased storytellers? Examining gender-bias in AI-generated narratives

Author

Listed:
  • Dialekti Athina Voutyrakou
  • Gianna Katsiampoura
  • Constantine Skordoulis

Abstract

With millions of people relying on Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools such as Copilot, Gemini, and ChatGPT in their daily lives, evaluating the fairness of these systems and investigating their potential biases is crucial. The purpose of this research is to examine whether AI tools associate certain professions and hobbies with specific genders during storytelling, potentially perpetuating gender stereotypes. The study employs a dual approach: text-based and image-based storytelling are analyzed through controlled experiments. In the text analysis, patterns in gender-occupation pairings are identified, while the image analysis focuses on visual depictions of gender roles in professions and activities. Our findings show that all three AI tools consistently exhibit gender biases, linking particular jobs and hobbies with traditional gender roles in both textual and visual outputs. These biases could reinforce societal stereotypes, shaping users' perceptions of gender roles, especially in educational contexts. In conclusion, this study emphasizes the need for debiasing strategies to ensure AI tools foster inclusivity and fairness. Addressing these issues is essential for the equitable design of AI tools and crucial for creating an inclusive educational framework that empowers individuals to explore diverse identities and career paths.

Suggested Citation

  • Dialekti Athina Voutyrakou & Gianna Katsiampoura & Constantine Skordoulis, 2025. "Are AI tools biased storytellers? Examining gender-bias in AI-generated narratives," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(4), pages 1032-1049.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:1032-1049:id:6169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/6169/2217
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:1032-1049:id:6169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.