IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i6p3693-3703id2811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehending geometry proofs: A study on prospective mathematics teachers' perceptions and preferences of proof formats

Author

Listed:
  • Lathiful Anwar
  • Cholis Sa’dijah
  • Tomi Listiawan
  • Anita Dewi Utami
  • Hutkemri Zulnaidi
  • Leong Kwan Eu

Abstract

The explicative aim of this research is to investigate the optics of proof format preferences held by prospective mathematics teachers (PMTs), in an effort to assess the effect that such preferences may have on their understanding of geometric proofs. The researchers employed a qualitative case study approach, in which six PMTs participated in Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) on the three styles of proof: paragraph proof, two-column proof and flow-chart proof. The methodology employed also focused on the formatting models by exploring the participants’ suggestions regarding each format in order to determine their cognitive responses as well as their preferences. The study exposes different preferences among PMTs which are a result of their personal cognitive style and experience with proofs. Some of the PMTs preferred the two-column format due to its systematic and logical nature, other PMTs preferred the storytelling nature of the paragraph proof format sponsored also flow-chart representation. These preferences bring out the requirement for the development of pedagogical strategies that employ different proof formats in order to meet the needs of different types of learners for effective understanding. In summary, this research demonstrates the need for customizing proof instruction to different students’ needs which can hopefully enhance PMTs’ responses and interactions with the concept of mathematical proofs. The practical outcomes show that teachers should not be afraid to think in more flexible witnessing forms of proof in order to aid students learning while minimizing the cognitive load in line with the principles of constructivist learning. It would be worthwhile however to extend this research and examine what these preferences would mean for the future and how those would fit within the context of online education with the overall aim of creating a better mathematics curriculum that is more effective and has a wider reach.

Suggested Citation

  • Lathiful Anwar & Cholis Sa’dijah & Tomi Listiawan & Anita Dewi Utami & Hutkemri Zulnaidi & Leong Kwan Eu, 2024. "Comprehending geometry proofs: A study on prospective mathematics teachers' perceptions and preferences of proof formats," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 3693-3703.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:3693-3703:id:2811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/2811/1055
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:3693-3703:id:2811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.