IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i4p1841-1855id1556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing the open-badges guideline based on the fuzzy Delphi method

Author

Listed:
  • Siti Hajar Halili
  • Norharyanti Mohsin
  • Zamzami Zainuddin
  • Juliana Othman
  • Shukri Sulaiman

Abstract

This study aims to obtain expert consensus on the appropriate elements of open badge learning guidelines. The Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) was used to reach a consensus from 20 experts with different backgrounds. These guidelines were designed and developed based on the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) as well as the integration of the ASSURE instructional design model by Heinich, Molenda, and Russell (1993). The guidelines were evaluated by selected experts using several criteria, and data were collected through questionnaires. Based on the results of the study, all items meet the requirements in the number of three fuzzy triangles and pass the de-fuzzing process (more than Alpha α – cut-off value 0.5). Therefore, the findings of the study show that the experts agree that this module is suitable to be implemented according to the six themes set. The findings highlight key constructs for OBL guideline development included several key constructs related to OBL guideline content, state guideline objectives, method, media/tool, and material selection, as well as recommendations for use and participation based on the ASSURE instructional design model. Further research can incorporate insights from fields such as psychology, sociology, and educational policy. The focus should be on technical aspects and use qualitative and quantitative methods to ensure that all students, regardless of background, receive fair qualifications and recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Siti Hajar Halili & Norharyanti Mohsin & Zamzami Zainuddin & Juliana Othman & Shukri Sulaiman, 2024. "Designing the open-badges guideline based on the fuzzy Delphi method," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(4), pages 1841-1855.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:1841-1855:id:1556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/1556/508
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:1841-1855:id:1556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.