IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v8y2024i4p1271-1282id1504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of ai in learning English: a comparative study between Moroccan and Indonesian undergraduate students from the English department

Author

Listed:
  • Insaf KHOUDRI
  • Mohammed ZERIOUH
  • Umar FAUZAN
  • Abderrafiî KHOUDRI

Abstract

It is generally understood that people’s attitudes influence and shape their behavior. However, there is still a gap in knowledge regarding how undergraduate students from different countries perceive AI in learning English. This paper aims to compare two groups of undergraduate students from the English departments of Morocco and Indonesia. To achieve this, an online structured questionnaire was administered to 240 undergraduate students from these two countries. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 25 and the Mann-Whitney test. The findings revealed that both groups are optimistic about using AI for learning English. They utilize AI tools for feedback, engagement, motivation, personalized learning, and autonomy. However, there is a disparity in how each group uses AI for translation. Additionally, participants expressed concerns about AI related to privacy and security, overreliance and lack of responsibility, critical thinking and creativity issues, and plagiarism. The study suggests that AI can be both beneficial and detrimental. Incorporating AI into the classroom is essential for improving students’ AI literacy and enhancing their academic and language skills. A balanced approach to AI use involves not only providing students with diverse AI tools suited to their academic needs but also raising awareness about the ethical issues associated with AI.

Suggested Citation

  • Insaf KHOUDRI & Mohammed ZERIOUH & Umar FAUZAN & Abderrafiî KHOUDRI, 2024. "The use of ai in learning English: a comparative study between Moroccan and Indonesian undergraduate students from the English department," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(4), pages 1271-1282.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:1271-1282:id:1504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/1504/463
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:1271-1282:id:1504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.