IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajo/reissc/v8y2025i5p51-58id496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reassessing Gender Bias in Japanese Spousal Terms: A Replication of Nin and Mori (2025) with Elderly Participants

Author

Listed:
  • NIN Ri
  • Ken-ichi NEMOTO
  • Kazuo MORI

Abstract

This study replicated Nin and Mori (2025), which used a paper-based Implicit Association Test (FUMIE test) to examine gender bias in Japanese spousal terms. While the original study involved undergraduates, the present study targeted older citizens aged 40 and above. Forty-three participants completed two FUMIE tests assessing implicit preferences for the traditional terms shujin–kanai and the more neutral otto–tsuma. The results largely mirrored those of younger participants: both age groups showed stronger associations favoring male-oriented terms. However, older female participants still implicitly preferred shujin over kanai, while showing no preference between otto and tsuma. Younger females in Nin and Mori (2025), by contrast, showed no significant preference for both pairs. These findings suggest a generational shift toward gender neutrality in implicit attitudes among Japanese women. Despite this trend, both older and younger males continued to associate male spousal terms more positively. The study highlights the value of implicit measures in detecting subtle gender biases across age groups in Japanese society.

Suggested Citation

  • NIN Ri & Ken-ichi NEMOTO & Kazuo MORI, 2025. "Reassessing Gender Bias in Japanese Spousal Terms: A Replication of Nin and Mori (2025) with Elderly Participants," Research in Social Sciences, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 8(5), pages 51-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajo:reissc:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:51-58:id:496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/riss/article/view/496/252
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:reissc:v:8:y:2025:i:5:p:51-58:id:496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucía Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/riss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.