IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajo/reissc/v8y2025i4p25-39id446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Bias in the use of Teknonymy as Spousal Terms: Insights from Online Surveys in China, South Korea, and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Nin Ri

Abstract

This study aims to uncover gender bias in the use of teknonymy as spousal terms through online surveys conducted in China, South Korea, and Japan. The study focuses on how married individuals address their spouses in private settings. The findings reveal that teknonymy is significantly more prevalent in Japan and South Korea than in China, with usage patterns in the former two countries varying according to age and educational background. In contrast, the use of teknonymy in China is infrequent and relatively unaffected by these factors. In Japan and South Korea, teknonymy is more frequently employed by women, suggesting the continued influence of traditional gender norms that reinforce patriarchal family structures and male authority. Despite these patterns, evidence of generational and educational shifts suggests a gradual transformation toward more egalitarian modes of spousal terms. The cross-national differences observed in this study highlight the complex interaction among language, culture, and gender, and underline the need for further research into the sociocultural factors that shape evolving spousal terms in contemporary Asian societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nin Ri, 2025. "Gender Bias in the use of Teknonymy as Spousal Terms: Insights from Online Surveys in China, South Korea, and Japan," Research in Social Sciences, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 25-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajo:reissc:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:25-39:id:446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/riss/article/view/446/232
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:reissc:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:25-39:id:446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LucĂ­a Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/riss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.