IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajn/agricu/v10y2025i4p31-37id377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Australian Red Claw Crayfish Growth, Protein Content Nad Meat Characteristics Across Diverse Natural Feeds

Author

Listed:
  • Guillier T. Tan
  • Melody M. Nacor
  • Rhenalyn A. Ramos
  • Kent Lewis L. Samson
  • Roxette N. Sanchez

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the growth performance, feed conversion ratio (FCR), mortality rates, protein content, meat characteristics, and profitability of ARC crayfish fed with different natural feeds. Results showed that crayfish fed with commercial feeds had the highest weight gain and a better feed conversion ratio (28.2) compared to natural feeds. Crayfish fed with trash fish and eggshell had the highest mean mortality (4.33). The highest crude protein was recorded from crayfish fed with a combination of vegetables, trash fish, and eggshell. For sensory evaluation, it showed that crayfish fed with vegetables and eggshell had the best meat taste, texture, and aroma. Lastly, the highest ROI was observed in crayfish fed with trash fish and eggshell. Overall, these findings focused on the potential of other natural feeds as alternatives to commercial crayfish feeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillier T. Tan & Melody M. Nacor & Rhenalyn A. Ramos & Kent Lewis L. Samson & Roxette N. Sanchez, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Australian Red Claw Crayfish Growth, Protein Content Nad Meat Characteristics Across Diverse Natural Feeds," Agricultural Development, Eastern Centre of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 31-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajn:agricu:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:31-37:id:377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecsenet.com/index.php/2576-6740/article/view/377/148
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajn:agricu:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:31-37:id:377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tracy William The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tracy William to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ecsenet.com/index.php/2576-6740/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.