IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajn/abrjou/v10y2025i3p50-57id318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Relationship between Institutional Pressures and the Level of Corporate Social responsibility Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies on the Stock Market in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Pham Thi Bich Thu
  • Tran Thi Lan Hương

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure has become a crucial aspect of business operations, influenced by various institutional pressures. This study examines the relationship between institutional pressures and the level of CSR disclosure among firms. Empirical evidence collected through a survey of 208 senior executives of listed firms in Vietnam’s stock exchange indicates that coercive pressure, normative pressure, and mimetic pressure have a positive relationship with various aspects of CSR disclosure levels. This study employs an empirical approach to assess how institutional factors influence CSR disclosure in Vietnam. The findings provide valuable insights for both corporate managers and policymakers in fostering a more transparent and responsible business environment. Finally, the research offers practical recommendations to enhance CSR disclosure, ensuring that businesses align with global sustainability standards while addressing local institutional challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Pham Thi Bich Thu & Tran Thi Lan Hương, 2025. "Research on the Relationship between Institutional Pressures and the Level of Corporate Social responsibility Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies on the Stock Market in Vietnam," Asian Business Research Journal, Eastern Centre of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 50-57.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajn:abrjou:v:10:y:2025:i:3:p:50-57:id:318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecsenet.com/index.php/2576-6759/article/view/318/135
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajn:abrjou:v:10:y:2025:i:3:p:50-57:id:318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tracy William The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tracy William to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ecsenet.com/index.php/2576-6759/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.