Author
Abstract
This study examines the impact of geopolitical shocks on international and regional trade integration, with a specific focus on the BRICS economies. The increasing fragmentation of global trade and the rising frequency of geopolitical conflicts have raised urgent questions as to how nations adapt their trade strategies amid uncertainty. The primary objective of this research is to analyze whether such geopolitical risks amplify trade volatility and accelerate shifts toward regionalism. The study hypothesizes that second-moment uncertainty shocks such as political instability, sanctions, or global conflicts lead to a disproportionate decline in foreign trade while simultaneously boosting intra-regional trade flows within BRICS. The study integrates Bloom’s (2009) uncertainty shock framework into an open economy model and empirically tests it using the cross-quantilogram (CQ) method. The study employs monthly data from the BRICS countries spanning the period 2000 to 2023. The CQ method captures the asymmetric response of trade integration to varying levels of geopolitical risk. The results reveal that higher geopolitical risks, especially during extreme events, are associated with a significant uptick in trade integration within the BRICS countries, thus supporting the theoretical model. Theoretically, this work contributes to the trade literature by integrating second-moment shocks and inventory adjustment mechanisms under uncertainty into open-economy frameworks. Practically, it offers insights for policymakers seeking resilient trade frameworks in the face of global instability. The findings emphasize the importance of regional strategies such as nearshoring and friend-shoring, which can reduce vulnerability to global shocks. This study offers a valuable lens for understanding the future of trade integration amid increasing geopolitical uncertainty.
Suggested Citation
Sidra Nazir, 2025.
"Geopolitical Shocks and Trade Integration: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the BRICS,"
Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 24(3), pages 786-815.
Handle:
RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:3:p:786-815
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.3.026
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- F1 - International Economics - - Trade
- F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
- F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
- D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:3:p:786-815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.