IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v24y2025i3p1093-1132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Meta-Systematic Review of the Literature on Accounting and Financial Reporting: A Comparison of Russian and International Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail V. Rodchenkov

Abstract

Objectively assessing and recognizing the contribution of national authors, universities, and research centers to the overall professional knowledge base in accounting and financial reporting, which forms the basis of economic scientific thinking, is crucial for motivating researchers and policymakers to improve the quality of their work within the global academic community. Therefore, it is scientifically interesting to disperse the results of publications on accounting and reporting from Russian and international practices. The aim of this study is to obtain and compare the results of a meta-systematic review of previous reviews on IFRS development, financial reporting and accounting, contrasting Russian and foreign viewpoints. The study hypothesizes that the results of bibliometric analysis in the field of accounting and reporting will vary depending on different levels of information technology, the analytical training of authors and the types of reviews. The methodology employs meta-systematic analysis using STATA algorithms and specialized VOSviewer software for network and graphical analysis. Drawing on quantitative metrics from 30 reviews and 2,670 citations from publications, a significant difference was found in the results of the meta-systematic review. The most pronounced discrepancies relate to review productivity indicators and the capacity to apply modern methods of scientific knowledge to target subject areas. These findings reveal systemic shortcomings in Russian research practices and dissemination of results internationally. Addressing these challenges will inform management decisions aimed at improving the national accounting and reporting system. Ultimately, this study supports the establishment of a framework to enhance the international visibility of Russian research, increase research efficiency, and improve the quality of systematic reviews in targeted accounting and financial reporting topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail V. Rodchenkov, 2025. "A Meta-Systematic Review of the Literature on Accounting and Financial Reporting: A Comparison of Russian and International Practices," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 24(3), pages 1093-1132.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:3:p:1093-1132
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.3.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2025/12_Rodchenkov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.3.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:3:p:1093-1132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.