IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/air/journl/v4y2017i9p980.html

Cross Countries Comparison of Luxembourg, Germany and India on the Basis of Five Variables, i.e. GDP per Capita, GDP Growth Rate, Scientific and Technical Journals, R & D Spending, Patent Applications for the Years 2000 to 2009

Author

Listed:
  • Waqar Ahmad
  • Doan Dung
  • Mono Heang
  • Aqsa Bibi

Abstract

In this paper we study about the cross countries comparison of Luxembourg, Germany and India on the basis of five variables , I.e. GDP per Capita, GDP growth rate, Scientific and technical Journals, R & D spending , patent Applications for the years 2000 to 2009. It is necessary that Luxembourg should do innovation (in the field of finance and Steel) to maintain its strength in the future. Germany should give focus on innovation as innovation and growth rate shows positive relationship in the country. On the other hand India should increase its R & D spending as that will further improve its GDP growth rate. So it is necessary for the countries that first they should identify fields/sectors and then decide about innovation. This paper shows that the GDP per Capita of Luxembourg is better from other two countries because it has a stable and solid growth, Low inflation, low unemployment, a strong financial sector, low tax rate and the most important an increasingly diversified in steel.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:air:journl:v:4:y:2017:i:9:p:980
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17521496
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.ijmae.com/article_115157_7e6fcfe060e07a351090e2a8aba363cf.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.17521496?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:air:journl:v:4:y:2017:i:9:p:980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Behzad Hassannezhad Kashani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijmae.com/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.