Author
Abstract
Quality management in production processes faces ongoing challenges related to variability and process stability, particularly in the context of complex manufacturing environments. Despite extensive use of Statistical Process Control (SPC) and Design of Experiments (DoE), there remains a gap in integrating these approaches with the Pareto Principle for effective decision-making and continuous improvement. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the combined application of the Pareto Principle with SPC and DoE in managing production quality. The case study was conducted in a single-component paint manufacturing company, focusing on dynamic viscosity as a key quality parameter. The research methodology included process data compliance evaluation, identification of variability sources, measurement system analysis, and the development of a fractional experimental design. The results revealed that operator performance was the primary source of variability. Among the studied factors, maintenance time and temperature during thickener activation had the most significant impact on process stability. Optimising these parameters led to a substantial reduction in natural variability, keeping viscosity within specification limits. The findings suggest that the integrated SPC-DoE-Pareto model provides an effective framework for addressing key sources of deviation and improving quality management decisions. This approach not only enhances process stability but also aligns with the principles of continuous improvement. Further research could explore the broader applicability of the SPC-DoE-Pareto integration in different industries and its impact on long-term process performance. Additionally, investigating the role of advanced automation and machine learning in supporting these models could offer new avenues for improvement in quality management.
Suggested Citation
Maciej Kardas, 2025.
"Application of the Pareto Principle in Quality Management through an Integrated Model of Statistical Process Control and Design of Experiments,"
Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 8(3), pages 44-79, November.
Handle:
RePEc:aid:journl:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:44-79
DOI: 10.34021/ve.2025.08.03(3)
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aid:journl:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:44-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aleksy Kwilinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akwilin.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.