IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aid/journl/v8y2025i1p84-101.html

Paradigms, Structures, and Simulations: Advancing Theory Building and Model Testing in Management Science

Author

Listed:
  • Henryk Dzwigol

    (Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland)

  • Rafis Abazov

    (Economic Commission for Europe, Economic and Social Council, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland)

Abstract

The growing complexity of managerial phenomena and the interdisciplinary nature of management science call for more coherent methodological frameworks for theory building and model testing. While management science draws from both technical and social disciplines, its theoretical development remains fragmented and often lacks methodological integration. Previous studies have highlighted inconsistencies between paradigmatic assumptions, modelling strategies, and empirical validation, particularly in the treatment of latent variables. Despite the broad adoption of structural equation modelling (SEM), its potential for bridging theory and empirical evidence in dynamic and virtual contexts remains underexplored. This study aims to conceptualise an integrative approach that connects paradigmatic foundations, structural modelling, and simulation-based testing within virtual environments. By analysing classical and contemporary management paradigms — including functionalist, interpretative, critical, and postmodern perspectives — the paper identifies methodological challenges in aligning theoretical reasoning with empirical analysis. The methodological framework combines SEM procedures, such as confirmatory factor analysis and model fit evaluation, with the use of virtual and simulation-based environments as experimental spaces for theory validation. The findings emphasise that virtual environments enable real-time experimentation, allowing for the iterative refinement of theoretical models under controlled digital conditions. These spaces enhance the reflexivity and reproducibility of management research by enabling researchers to observe the interaction between theoretical constructs and simulated organisational processes. The integration of SEM with simulation techniques demonstrates how theoretical constructs can be dynamically tested and adjusted through virtual modelling. The study concludes that theory building in management science benefits from combining paradigmatic reflection, structural modelling, and virtual experimentation. This triadic framework promotes methodological pluralism, computational adaptivity, and deeper theoretical coherence, suggesting that virtualised modelling environments may become essential tools for future management research and education.

Suggested Citation

  • Henryk Dzwigol & Rafis Abazov, 2025. "Paradigms, Structures, and Simulations: Advancing Theory Building and Model Testing in Management Science," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 8(1), pages 84-101, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:aid:journl:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:84-101
    DOI: 10.34021/ve.2025.08.01(5)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.virtual-economics.eu/index.php/VE/article/download/466/187
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.34021/ve.2025.08.01(5)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaap Kamps & Michael Masuch, 1997. "Partial Deductive Closure: Logical Simulation and Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(9), pages 1229-1245, September.
    2. Kamil Erkan Kabak & Johannes Hinckeldeyn & Rob Dekkers, 2024. "A systematic literature review into simulation for building operations management theory: reaching beyond positivism?," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 687-715, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dgr:rugsom:00b17 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Vermeulen, I. & Bruggeman, J., 2000. "The logic of organizational markets: thinking through resource partitioning theory," Research Report 00B17, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    3. Ivar Vermeulen & Jeroen Bruggeman, 2001. "The Logic of Organizational Markets: Thinking Through Resource Partitioning Theory," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 87-111, August.
    4. Moldoveanu, Mihnea, 2002. "Language, games and language games," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 233-251.
    5. Gotherwal, Deepesh & Ranjan, Pritam & Lekivetz, Ryan, 2026. "Comprehensive Review of Various Verification and Validation Techniques for Business Simulation Models," EconStor Preprints 339750, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aid:journl:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:84-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aleksy Kwilinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akwilin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.