IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aid/journl/v8y2025i1p16-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Risk-Return Profile of a Portfolio of ESG and Traditional Assets Using a Hybrid Optimisation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Attila Banyai

    (Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary)

  • Tibor Tatay

    (Department of Statistics, Finances and Controlling, Széchenyi István University, Hungary)

  • Gergo Thalmeiner

    (Department of Investment, Finance and Accounting, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary)

  • Laszlo Pataki

    (Doctoral School of Management and Business Administration, John von Neumann University, Hungary)

Abstract

This article examines the risk-return dynamics of portfolios combining environmental, social, and governance (ESG) assets with traditional investment instruments. A hybrid optimisation framework is applied, uniting mean-variance principles with combinatorial selection and machine learning techniques. The study addresses two central questions: whether ESG funds provide diversification benefits, and whether they mitigate downside risk in periods of financial stress. The analysis draws on a dataset of five ESG and five non-ESG funds, spanning varied sectors and risk profiles, observed over a five-year horizon marked by diverse macroeconomic conditions. Portfolio performance is evaluated using the Sharpe ratio, with differential evolution and support vector machine algorithms employed to capture linear and non-linear aspects of risk-adjusted returns. The findings reveal a consistent positive association between ESG allocation and portfolio performance. Optimised portfolios frequently allocated 80-90 per cent of their weight to ESG assets, particularly GRID and ESGV. ESG holdings were shown to strengthen diversification, improve upside potential, and reduce downside exposure, especially during volatile market phases. Traditional assets contributed stability but played a weaker role in enhancing risk-adjusted returns. Statistical analysis confirmed both research hypotheses: portfolios integrating ESG investments achieved higher Sharpe ratios without excessive risk, and ESG funds demonstrated resilience under adverse conditions. Machine learning models further underscored the significance of non-linear patterns, which enhanced the explanatory power of ESG exposure in the optimisation process. In sum, the study contributes to growing evidence that ESG assets not only advance sustainability objectives but also deliver measurable financial benefits. The hybrid methodological approach illustrates the importance of balanced allocation constraints and robust optimisation in portfolio design. These results suggest that incorporating ESG assets can simultaneously reinforce financial stability and support long-term sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Attila Banyai & Tibor Tatay & Gergo Thalmeiner & Laszlo Pataki, 2025. "Evaluating the Risk-Return Profile of a Portfolio of ESG and Traditional Assets Using a Hybrid Optimisation Model," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 8(1), pages 16-39, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:aid:journl:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:16-39
    DOI: 10.34021/ve.2025.08.01(2)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.virtual-economics.eu/index.php/VE/article/download/462/182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.34021/ve.2025.08.01(2)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aid:journl:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:16-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aleksy Kwilinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akwilin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.